Citation Chasing: Forward and Backward
Core summary
Citation chasing complements database searching by following the citation network — looking at who cited a key paper (forward) and what that key paper cited (backward). This catches studies your keyword search missed.
Detailed explanation
Detailed explanation
Even the best keyword search misses studies. Authors use unexpected terminology, papers get indexed late, or the relevant study is in a field you did not think to search. Citation chasing addresses these gaps. Backward citation chasing (reference list checking): Take a key paper on your topic. Open its reference list. Scan each reference — does it look relevant? If yes, retrieve it. This finds older foundational studies that informed the key paper. How to do it: Open the key paper, scroll to the References/Bibliography section, and review each entry. This is simple but time-consuming for papers with 40+ references. Forward citation chasing (cited-by searching): Take the same key paper. Find out which later papers cited it. This finds newer studies that built on the key paper's work. How to do it: - Google Scholar: Search for the paper, click 'Cited by [number]' below the result - Scopus: Look up the paper, click the citation count - Web of Science: Look up the paper, click 'Times Cited' When to use citation chasing: - After your database search, when you have identified 3-5 key papers - In systematic reviews (PRISMA encourages supplementary search methods) - When your database search returned few results - When you suspect relevant studies exist in adjacent fields Efficiency tip: Start with the most highly cited paper on your topic and the most recent systematic review. These two papers together will cover a large portion of the citation network. Limitation: Citation chasing is biased toward well-cited papers and established networks. Very new papers have few citations. Papers in non-English journals may be less cited.
Clinical example
A researcher finds 45 papers from a PubMed search on zinc supplementation in pneumonia. Forward citation chasing of the landmark Bhutta 1999 RCT reveals 12 additional studies, including 3 that used terms like 'micronutrient supplementation' or 'trace element therapy' — terms not in the original search.
Research example
Horsley et al. found that citation chasing identified 2.5-20% of included studies in systematic reviews that were not found by the original database searches, making it a valuable supplementary search method.
Knowledge check
Q1. What is forward citation chasing?
Q2. Why is citation chasing recommended alongside database searching?
Q3. Which is the most efficient starting point for citation chasing?